| March
8, 2006
Vitamin C could reduce inflammation
A diet rich in sources of vitamin C could cut the level
of markers for inflammation by 45 per cent, a result that needs
verifying by supplementation studies, says a new study.
Consumers have a positive image of vitamin C, with public perception
linking the vitamin to improved immune system health.
According to Frost and Sullivan, the US market generated $151.7m
(€127.4m) in 2005. In Europe, revenue was calculated at $160.3m
(€134.6m) for 2005, and is expected to grow to $192.5m (€161.6m)
by 2011.
The new cross-sectional study, published in this month's American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Vol. 83, pp. 567-574), examined
3258 men aged between 60 and 69 with no history of diabetes or
cardiovascular disease.
A food-frequency questionnaire was used to quantify vitamin C
intake from dietary and supplemental sources, and related to blood
levels of certain markers linked to inflammation: C-reactive protein
(CRP) and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA).
“Plasma vitamin C, fruit intake, and dietary vitamin
C intake were significantly and inversely associated with mean
concentrations of C-reactive protein, an acute phase reactant,
and t-PA antigen, a marker of endothelial dysfunction,”
wrote lead author Goya Wannamethee from the Royal Free and University
College Medical School, London.
High blood levels of vitamin C were associated with a 45 per cent
reduced risk of inflammation (with respect to CRP levels), and
high fruit intake was related to a 25 per cent reduced risk of
inflammation.
“Plasma (but not dietary) vitamin C also showed inverse
associations with both fibrongen concentrations and blood viscosity,”
reported Wannamethee.
In an accompanying editorial (Vol. 83, pp. 525-526), Ishwarlal
Jialal and Uma Singh from the University of California Davis Medical
Center, said: “It is important to emphasize that theirs
was a cross-sectional study and not a randomized placebo-based
clinical trial, and thus the authors conclusion is not firm and
cannot be used for policy guidelines.”
The editorial also pointed out that the study was only focused
on elderly white men and thus could not be generalized for other
races, women, and age groups.
Jialal and Singh also questioned the use of t-PA as a measure
of endothelial inflammation.
“It is not clear whether there is indeed a relation
between vitamin C and biomarkers of endothelial function, because
the authors did not show a correlation between vitamin C and von
Willebrand factor, another biomarker.”
Both commentators stressed that previous clinical trials (with
diabetics, smokers and healthy men) had not reported an anti-inflammatory
effect from vitamin C supplementation.
In contrast, intravenous vitamin C trials did report an improvement
in endothelial function.
“Much further research in a dose-response is required
to ascertain whether oral vitamin C supplementation is anti-inflammatory
and whether it improves endothelial dysfunction,” concluded
Jialal and Singh.
The recommended daily intake of the vitamin in Europe is 60 mg.
In the US, men are recommended to consume 90 mg per day, and women
75 mg per day.
Source: www.nutraingredients.com
Comment:
The scientists at the Dr. Rath Research Institute have already
confirmed this association. According to their research presentation,
a combination of specific cellular nutrients, including vitamin
C, effectively reduces the markers of inflammation. It is
not simply vitamin C that is effective but the combination
or synergy of specific nutrients that is more effective. |
|