| October
10, 2007
Taxol doesn't treat common breast cancer
By MARILYNN MARCHIONE, AP Medical Writer
Wed Oct 10, 7:56 PM ET
The widely used chemotherapy drug Taxol does not work for the
most common form of breast cancer and helps far fewer patients
than has been believed, surprising new research suggests.
If further study bears this out, more than 20,000 women each
year in the United States alone might be spared the side effects
of this drug or similar ones without significantly raising the
risk their cancer will return. That would be roughly half of all
breast cancer patients who get chemo now.
"We want to make sure these data are correct before withholding
it (Taxol) from some patients ... the stakes are high," said
the lead researcher, Dr. Daniel Hayes of the University of Michigan.
"On the other hand, we don't want to keep a therapy that
doesn't work."
In the study, Taxol did the most good for women who had overactive
HER-2 genes — the target of the newer breast cancer drug
Herceptin. These women were about 40 percent less likely to have
a recurrence if they received Taxol.
Conversely, Taxol did not significantly help women whose tumors
were HER-2 negative and were being helped to grow by estrogen.
This is the most common form of the disease.
The differences were revealed by a new analysis of a study done
in the 1990s, using modern genetic tools that were not available
at that time.
"The days of 'one size fits all' therapy for patients with
breast cancer are coming to an end," Dr. Anne Moore of Weill
Cornell Medical College wrote in an editorial accompanying the
study in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine.
"Oncologists have a responsibility to their patients to
be aware of this report."
The original study involved more than 3,000 women whose cancer
had spread to nearby lymph nodes but not widely throughout the
body. This is the situation of about one-fourth of the 175,000
women diagnosed with breast cancer in the U.S. each year.
Researchers tested adding paclitaxel, sold as Taxol by New York-based
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and now also in generic form. They gave
it after surgery to remove the cancer and treatment with the chemo
drugs Adriamycin and Cytoxan.
Taxol improved survival and became a new standard of care. But
the drug frequently causes neurological side effects including
numbness and tingling in the hands and feet. In the original study,
18 percent of women had this problem months and even years after
taking Taxol.
Even more worrisome has been the growing evidence that some women
do not benefit as much from chemo as others. Hayes and other researchers
wondered whether that was true in their Taxol study.
They retrieved frozen tissue samples from 1,500 of the original
participants, did genetic tests to better identify their types
of cancer, and discovered big differences in who had responded
to the drug.
The study was paid for by grants from the federal government
and a breast cancer foundation. Several researchers consult for
Bristol-Myers Squibb.
"We should have done this a long time ago," but the
tools were lacking and researchers now have the advantage of longer
follow-up of these women, said another senior author, Donald Berry.
He is biostatistics chief at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson
Cancer Center.
Berry is reanalyzing another earlier Taxol study, and Moore urged
other scientists to do the same.
With more evidence, "we can begin to use the biology of
the cancer to decide whether the chemotherapy will work"
before subjecting women to it, Hayes said.
The typical four-cycle treatment with generic paclitaxel costs
$7,000 or more, including infusion fees that doctors charge. Insurance
typically pays most of this.
For now, many doctors will be reluctant to skip Taxol or other
chemo, said Dr. Julie Gralow, a cancer specialist at the University
of Washington School of Medicine. Some may fear lawsuits if the
cancer recurs and the chemo wasn't given, she said.
"It's just so much easier to give the chemotherapy and know
you've been super-aggressive."
However, Kris Miller, a 54-year-old former nurse from Chelsea,
Mich., said patients should be given the choice. She has had problems
since taking Taxol two years ago for a type of breast cancer that
the new research suggests would not respond to the drug.
"Most people recover from it, and I guess I'm one of those
unfortunate ones that did not," she said of the side effects.
"I have severe numbness and tingling, mostly in my feet.
It becomes painful by the end of the day. It never goes away."
"I hope they give people that option," to weigh the
risks and benefits and possibly skip Taxol, she said. "If
I was going through it now, I would like to have that information."
Source: news.yahoo.com
Comment:
Taxol® (Paclitaxel) - a chemotherapy drug - is mostly
used in the treatment of ovarian, breast and non-small cell
lung cancer; and is often administered in combination with
other anti-cancer drugs. It supposedly works by stopping
the cancer cells from separating into new cells, thereby
blocking the growth of cancer. Taxol® has been on the
market since 1990, and is the most common treatment for
the majority of common cancers. In 2000, Taxol manufacturer
Bristol-Myers Squibb reported its annual sales of the drug
(Paclitaxel Injection) was $1.592 billion - equal to an
excess of $4.3 million per day!! Taxol continues to be the
most popular anti-cancer agent, despite serious side effects
affecting the nervous system. As this article says, "We
should have done this a long time ago." One of the
physicians told the real story behind continuing Taxol prescription
- that physicians would continue using Taxol for the fear
of law-suits and not necessarily for the health of the patient.
Dr. Rath's research shows that the metastasis of cancer
can be safely blocked by synergistic combination of specific
cellular nutrients. Please read about this research breakthrough
on www.drrathresearch.org.
|
|